{"id":714,"date":"2008-06-30T09:23:34","date_gmt":"2008-06-30T01:23:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/http:\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/archives\/2008\/06\/2008_06_30_0923.php"},"modified":"2008-06-30T09:23:34","modified_gmt":"2008-06-30T01:23:34","slug":"if-the-women-only-tried","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2008\/06\/30\/if-the-women-only-tried","title":{"rendered":"If the women only tried&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/health\/7475695.stm\" title=\"read article\">Sexes split over one night stands<\/a><\/h3>\n<p>Many women are left unhappy in the aftermath of casual sexual encounters, a survey has revealed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Thank God for an article like <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/health\/7475695.stm\" title=\"read article\">this,<\/a> I&#8217;ll finally get to say something I&#8217;ve come to realize &#8211; that I could never bring up out of the blue.<\/p>\n<p>While the article obviously focuses on <em>one-night-stands,<\/em> I personally have noticed something significant and worthy of mention as far as heterosexual relationships go. I encompasses most of (if not all) relationship issues a woman may experience &#8211; that even the more complex\/controversial issues, like in the article, are merely subsets.<\/p>\n<p>I tried synthesizing different opinions\/perspectives of various women I&#8217;ve had deep  conversations with regarding relationship issues they were having. I would probably say this would be a great follow up to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2005\/06\/2005_06_23_1156.php\" title=\"view post\">post I wrote 3 years ago,<\/a> which a friend of mine reminded me of because of its &#8220;accuracy&#8221; (she was a woman by the way so shut up)<\/p>\n<p>Before I proceed, I feel compelled to remind everyone that while there may be exceptions, we <strong>all<\/strong> know <em>most<\/em> issues, or at least issues being blown out of proportion, are almost always the woman&#8217;s doing. If you&#8217;re a woman and disagree, feel free to drop me a line and counter this claim. But before going off your handle, at least try to hear why I think this is the case.<\/p>\n<!--more-->\n<p>People may claim varying complexities and exceptions in their relationships to justify all sorts of arguments. And I&#8217;m not here to disabuse them as there are and will be special cases. But for the most part, if if you really distill most of these issues to the basic facts, the basic situations, etc., it boils down to just this:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Women see the glass as half-empty.<\/strong>\n<strong>Men see the glass as half-full.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m going to qualify and substantiate that claim in a while &#8211; so you won&#8217;t really get a chance to say I&#8217;m making a thoughtless, sweeping statement.<\/p>\n<h1>Preamble<\/h1>\n<p>As I said, I&#8217;ve already <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2005\/06\/2005_06_23_1156.php\" title=\"view post\">posted in the past<\/a> some thoughts about the fundamental differences in women and men and why I think that women have a serious disadvantage which they really bring upon themselves. I don&#8217;t want to antagonize anyone early on in this post so just consider that statement as an observation.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that very little, if anything at all, has changed since that post. Almost everything I&#8217;ve said there still applies, and is <strong>constantly vindicated,<\/strong> no matter how many more &#8220;special&#8221; situations my friends (both male and female, and even I myself) have experienced over time. I&#8217;m still not claiming this to be absolute; the reason for which you&#8217;ll see at the end, but in our culture, it&#8217;s pretty much 99.9% accurate.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve rationalized\/sythesized the hell out of the different issues\/situations\/stories\/experiences from me and my friends. And just for kicks, I&#8217;ll even justify the <em>need<\/em> to rationalize. <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_1');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_1');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_1\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">1 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_1\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Because I just know the last bastion of women would be to claim rationalization being incompatible with relationships (which are largely based on emotions) <\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_1').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_1', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<p>There is <strong>one<\/strong> new thing that I&#8217;d like to add to that post. I&#8217;ve realized, that by a certain time, the whole &#8220;eh kasi <code>insert_gender_here<\/code>&#8221; <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_2');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_2');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_2\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">2 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_2\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Because he&#8217;s\/she&#8217;s a man\/woman<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_2').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_2', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> argument doesn&#8217;t, or more accurately, <strong>shouldn&#8217;t<\/strong> hold water anymore. The reason for this is simple; if one side can use that argument to justify their gender&#8217;s preference on any given issue, it&#8217;s only fair that the <em>other side<\/em> could use the corollary to justify <em>their<\/em> postion &#8211; so ultimately the whole thing loses its purpose because they just cancel each other out. When that happens (and this is what puts the women at a disadvantage), we&#8217;re usually left with <strong>logic and reason.<\/strong> <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_3');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_3');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_3\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">3 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_3\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Because the &#8220;thing&#8221; that&#8217;s usually cancelled out, is the emotional side of things.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_3').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_3', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<p>I have to be honest; I think that&#8217;s a good thing. Not because it gives the men (and some women) an advantage, but simply because its the <em>only<\/em> type of argument that will <em>make sense<\/em> regardless of which side its coming from. Emotions can change, but facts are fucking facts.<\/p>\n<p>An analogy I would submit to exemplify this point is a woman PMSing, or a pregnant woman. That they&#8217;re hormonally imbalanced gives them temporary rights to be the way they are, and of course the men will accommodate their actions during those wonderful days of their lives. But make no mistake, ultimately <strong>both<\/strong> sides know who&#8217;s being <strong>illogical,<\/strong> who&#8217;s being <strong>unreasonable.<\/strong> This is because of rational thinking.<\/p>\n<p>Rational thinking; it&#8217;s the common ground where both sides <em>should<\/em> be able to stand on equal footing. The reason why women are usually on the shorter end of the stick isn&#8217;t because they are incapable, but <strong>only<\/strong> because their emotions tend to tell them the exact opposite of what&#8217;s <strong>perfectly clear<\/strong> in their rational mind &#8211; and they still end up following the former! God knows why they do that, but that&#8217;s just how it is. And this is why I said this early on:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>most<\/em> issues, or at least issues being blown out of proportion, are almost always the woman&#8217;s doing. <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_4');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_4');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_4\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">4 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_4\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">I say &#8220;doing&#8221; and not fault, because it may be the man&#8217;s fault, but needlessly escalating the issues to dangerous levels will always be the woman&#8217;s doing.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_4').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_4', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The reason why I think that emotional tendencies should only be acceptable during those &#8220;special&#8221; days\/months is because if women didn&#8217;t keep that aspect of themselves in check, they&#8217;ll end up applying those tendencies <strong>every single goddamn second in a relationship.<\/strong> Even if only in small doses, those can add-up &#8211; and many decent relationships have been doomed because of that.<\/p>\n<h1>Now lets get to the meat<\/h1>\n<p>I&#8217;ve discussed the tendencies, I&#8217;ve discussed the underlying anatomical inclination, but now lets try dissecting what I think is the philosophical reason why women think this way. Just to remind you, the thesis is this:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Women see the glass as half-empty.<\/strong>\n<strong>Men see the glass as half-full.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve already said that the article is just a subset of issues that can spring forth from this notion, but let&#8217;s use it anyways.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Some of the their reasons for the encounters were because they felt there was the possibility of a longer term relationship.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That right there, why do they even think about that? It&#8217;s a fucking <em>one night stand<\/em> for pete&#8217;s sake. The longest anyone should think about it is for that <strong>ONE GODDAMNED NIGHT!<\/strong> Anything more than that and you automatically invalidate your right to being &#8220;right.&#8221; That you &#8220;can&#8217;t help it&#8221; is <strong>never<\/strong> an excuse &#8211; unless you&#8217;re PMSing or pregnant (in that case you shouldn&#8217;t even be having a one night stand, that&#8217;s just gross).<\/p>\n<p>A fucking baby can eat shit because they &#8220;can&#8217;t help it,&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t make it acceptable in any terms.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;m not here to nitpick on those details. What&#8217;s interesting is <em>why<\/em> they think that way&#8230; <em>why<\/em> they see the <strong>lack of<\/strong> long-term opportunity as a problem. And  common answer that <em>will<\/em> almost always unravel is this: <strong>half-empty.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I told this to a [woman] friend of mine who was experiencing such a dilemma during a fling <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_5');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_5');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_5\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">5 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_5\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">I know what you&#8217;re thinking! It WASN&#8217;T with ME ok? Hahahaha<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_5').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_5', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>You&#8217;re getting 70% of what you&#8217;d &#8220;like.&#8221;\nAnd you&#8217;re complaining because you&#8217;re not getting the other 30%.\nSo where&#8217;s the sense in preferring to get <strong>nothing<\/strong> just because you can never have it all?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Now I have to admit, that setup was a &#8220;fling&#8221; and not really a serious relationship &#8211; so those values are applicable in that context. If it were a real romantic relationship, you&#8217;re entitled to expect more. I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s right, but you&#8217;re entitled to that opinion. Though you&#8217;d <em>still<\/em> be hard-pressed to find a man that can truly give you that without you having to resort to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2008\/06\/2008_06_19_1458.php\" title=\"view post\">synthesizing some happiness<\/a>. Plus, that doesn&#8217;t negate the fact that you were focusing on what was lacking, rather than being thankful of what was there.<\/p>\n<p>So with that as an example, I invite all the women to think about all the times they argued with their significant others, their casual flings, their &#8220;special&#8221; friendships, etc. And I dare you to tell me that it <strong>wasn&#8217;t<\/strong> because you were disappointed with what you <strong>didn&#8217;t<\/strong> get, or <strong>aren&#8217;t getting.<\/strong> It&#8217;s not enough, it&#8217;s never enough&#8230; it&#8217;ll always be <strong>half empty.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an amusing experiment: who among you women readers actually caught this in the article:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Just under half<\/strong> of women who answered the internet poll, published in the journal &#8220;Human Nature&#8221;, said they felt it had been a bad idea.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s <strong>less<\/strong> than half. Meaning more women actually enjoyed such experiences. This is probably the only time where women will interpret the statistic as &#8220;half full;&#8221; <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_6');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_714_1('footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_6');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_6\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">6 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_6\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">For the wrong reasons at that!<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_6').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_714_1_6', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> that the majority of women are disappointed &#8211; perhaps in the hopes of deluding themselves that it&#8217;s really OK to have ridiculous expectations of\/from men.<\/p>\n<p>But going back to the article, this is the second and most important point I&#8217;d like to drive home&#8230; the very reason my post has its title.<\/p>\n<p>Women <strong>can<\/strong> enjoy experiences just as they are if they just put their minds to it. Non-romantic experiences may just be blips in the greater scheme of things. The presence (or absence) of such experiences shouldn&#8217;t impact in your life drastically; they&#8217;re just bonuses &#8211; icing in the cake of life. But should should you indulge, here&#8217;s my take on it:<\/p>\n<p>50%, hell, even 1% may be less than a hundred, but it&#8217;s certainly better than 0. So I ask you, do you really want to be miserable because of the 50-99% you <em>technically <strong>don&#8217;t need<\/strong><\/em> in the first place? Or would you prefer to just enjoy that 1-50% as a bonus?<\/p>\n<p>The math is so simple that it&#8217;s beyond me how women can turn these little &#8220;bonuses&#8221; into full blown life-altering issues by mere <em>over-analysis.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Live a little. Have fun for the sake of fun. And maybe&#8230; just maybe, you&#8217;d look back at your life and see it as a series of wonderful &#8220;experiences\/bonuses&#8221; instead of a ton of regrets.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s <strong>half full<\/strong> people. And <strong>if the women only tried to see it that way, everyone would be having a much more positive outlook in <em>all types<\/em> of relationships, serious or fleeting.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t see how that can be a bad thing.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>And for my friends, if ever you&#8217;re thinking &#8220;is something happening with him and Cris?&#8221; The answer is <strong>no.<\/strong> Cris and I are just peachy \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>I may be posting a lot of &#8220;relationship&#8221; commentaries recently, but it&#8217;s only because I know of at least 5 other people experiencing these issues &#8211; and they&#8217;re all women (what a surprise!)<\/p><div class=\"speaker-mute footnotes_reference_container\"> <div class=\"footnote_container_prepare\"><p><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_label pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_714_1();\">Notes<\/span><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button\" style=\"display: none;\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_714_1();\">[<a id=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_714_1\">+<\/a>]<\/span><\/p><\/div> <div id=\"footnote_references_container_714_1\" style=\"\"><table class=\"footnotes_table footnote-reference-container\"><caption class=\"accessibility\">Notes<\/caption> <tbody> \r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_1');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_1\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>1<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Because I just know the last bastion of women would be to claim rationalization being incompatible with relationships (which are largely based on emotions) <\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_2');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_2\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>2<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Because he&#8217;s\/she&#8217;s a man\/woman<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_3');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_3\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>3<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Because the &#8220;thing&#8221; that&#8217;s usually cancelled out, is the emotional side of things.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_4');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_4\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>4<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">I say &#8220;doing&#8221; and not fault, because it may be the man&#8217;s fault, but needlessly escalating the issues to dangerous levels will always be the woman&#8217;s doing.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_5');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_5\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>5<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">I know what you&#8217;re thinking! It WASN&#8217;T with ME ok? Hahahaha<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_714_1_6');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_714_1_6\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>6<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">For the wrong reasons at that!<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n <\/tbody> <\/table> <\/div><\/div><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function footnote_expand_reference_container_714_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_714_1').show(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_714_1').text('\u2212'); } function footnote_collapse_reference_container_714_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_714_1').hide(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_714_1').text('+'); } function footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_714_1() { if (jQuery('#footnote_references_container_714_1').is(':hidden')) { footnote_expand_reference_container_714_1(); } else { footnote_collapse_reference_container_714_1(); } } function footnote_moveToReference_714_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_714_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } } function footnote_moveToAnchor_714_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_714_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } }<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sexes split over one night stands Many women are left unhappy in the aftermath of casual sexual encounters, a survey has revealed. Thank God for an article like this, I&#8217;ll finally get to say something I&#8217;ve come to realize &#8211; that I could never bring up out of the blue. While the article obviously focuses &hellip; <p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2008\/06\/30\/if-the-women-only-tried\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;If the women only tried&#8230;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,5,11],"tags":[481,523,524,757,1300],"class_list":["post-714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-internet","category-perspective","tag-glass","tag-half-empty","tag-half-full","tag-men","tag-women"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=714"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}