{"id":535,"date":"2006-11-07T16:36:01","date_gmt":"2006-11-07T08:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/http:\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/archives\/2006\/11\/2006_11_07_1636.php"},"modified":"2017-02-11T08:31:07","modified_gmt":"2017-02-11T08:31:07","slug":"its-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/11\/07\/its-here","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s here&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/119\/291287196_cb53d59487_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/119\/291287196_cb53d59487_s.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I got reprimanded by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fightpompe.com\" title=\"visit site\">Juan<\/a> last week during one of our conversations:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>juanporu:<\/strong> bibili na dapat ako ng c2d<br \/>\n<strong>juanporu:<\/strong> kaso naubos pera ko dun sa <code>&lt;site we rather not mention&gt;<\/code><br \/>\n<strong>nargz:<\/strong> &#8220;c2d&#8221;?<br \/>\n<strong>juanporu:<\/strong> core 2 duo<br \/>\n<strong>juanporu:<\/strong> you gotta be in with the linggo dude&#8230;<br \/>\n<strong>juanporu:<\/strong> you&#8217;re about to own one  <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/111\/291287220_813978d4a6_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/111\/291287220_813978d4a6_s.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Now, I am forced to <em>&#8220;get with the linggo,&#8221;<\/em> as it were &#8211; as I am now an owner of a MBP 15&#8243; 2.33GHz C2D with 2GB RAM, 256MB VRAM, and sure, FW800 as well. That <em>linggo<\/em>-ed enough?<\/p>\n<p>Kidding aside, I promised Juan a &#8220;review&#8221; of the new MBP in comparison to an old PowerBook G4 &#8211; I&#8217;ll be getting to the performance part soon enough. Meanwhile, let me focus on the aesthetics &#8211; which we know Apple fans go <em>gaga<\/em> over.<\/p>\n<!--more-->\n<h1>THE DIFFERENCES<\/h1>\n<p>Everyone knows that MBPs have a few cosmetic differences from the G4s, but for those who really want to <em>see<\/em> the difference, then you&#8217;re in luck, I&#8217;ve done a side-by-side comparison of the old PB G4 and MBP C2D. Here we have the slim box, which is drastically different from the PowerBooks (I&#8217;m not certain when they started making them slimmer, but my guess is after they had switched to Intel).<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/118\/291287243_6284908593_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/118\/291287243_6284908593_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p>Putting the MacBook Pro (left) beside a PowerBook (right) shows how much &#8220;slimmer&#8221; and &#8220;wider&#8221; it actually is.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/118\/291287184_ec116a13f8_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/118\/291287184_ec116a13f8_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p>And if that doesn&#8217;t convince you, here&#8217;s a better shot:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/114\/291287142_fd4860f477_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/114\/291287142_fd4860f477_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p>Flip them over and you see how the backside has changed as well. Gone are the days when you had to have a coin handy to unlock\/detach the battery. We now have a dual-slider setup.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/117\/291287170_cfd0fc63f5_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/117\/291287170_cfd0fc63f5_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p>One trivial, but nice improvement was the model badge, wich was now &#8220;plated&#8221; (whether plastic, or metal is anyone&#8217;s guess), but it sure beats the &#8220;print&#8221; of the G4s.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/104\/291287125_c5d9201843_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/104\/291287125_c5d9201843_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/115\/291287103_ac604b1303_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/115\/291287103_ac604b1303_t.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Aside from those already mentioned, other differences include:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Infra-red sensor (for remote)<\/li>\n<li>Dual latches (for closing the lid.<\/li>\n<li>Wider trackpad<\/li>\n<li>No composite (s-video?) out.<\/li>\n<li>mini PCMCIA slot. <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_1');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_1');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_1\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">1 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_1\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Now this is actually something I don&#8217;t like, since now I can&#8217;t use my PCMCIA CF card adaptor with it.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_1').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_1', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/li>\n<li>Higher resolution &#8211; but this was already started with the motion-sensor equipped Powerbooks.<\/li>\n<li>Significantly brighter keyboard backlight &#8211; when people say that the MBP&#8217;s <em>lowest<\/em> setting is as bright as the PB&#8217;s <em>highest<\/em> setting, they weren&#8217;t exaggerating!<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a rel=\"lightbox[mbp01]\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/105\/291364737_43868d3e54_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/105\/291364737_43868d3e54_m.jpg\"><\/a>\n<br>\nForgive the noise, didn&#8217;t have a tripod so I just maxed-out the ISO\n<\/div>\n<h1>PERFORMANCE<\/h1>\n<p>I can get into the details another day, but right off the bat, here are some noticeable performance improvements.<\/p>\n<h3>SNAPPIER<\/h3>\n<p>Obviously this 2.33GHz C2D would be way faster than my 1.5GHz PPC, while I do not bother finding out the obvious incremental speed improvements. I do have to say that one major concern of mine was running the non UB <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_2');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_2');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_2\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">2 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_2\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Universal Binary &#8211; applications that were compiled to fully support the new architecture.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_2').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_2', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> applications on <em>Rosetta<\/em> <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_3');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_3');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_3\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">3 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_3\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Apple&#8217;s &#8220;pseudo-virtualization&#8221; PPC to x86 translation engine (think of it as &#8220;Classic&#8221; for PPC apps) <\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_3').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_3', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<p>People reported that the Intel Macs in general run Applications like Photoshop extremely slow &#8211; to the point of being ridiculous and unusable.<\/p>\n<p>So what I did was fire up a common session on OS X. I had my usual running apps (Mail, Adium, Firefox, Netnewswire) and I ran Illustrator, loaded an AI file, then went ahead and loaded MS Word, and Photoshop CS2 as well. While all the apps I just mentioned were running simultaneously, I decided to do some actual Photoshopping. I have to say that Photoshop running on <em>rosetta<\/em> on this MBP is <em>faster<\/em> than it running natively on my PB G4.<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"lightbox\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/101\/292118461_a2913ec427_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/101\/292118461_a2913ec427_s.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the picture on the right, I even used Photoshop <em>while<\/em> running a Parallels desktop environment. Didn&#8217;t skip a beat. Though I&#8217;ll have to agree with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fightpompe.com\" title=\"visit site\">Juan<\/a> that the 2GB RAM probably had a big part to play in it. I was able to allot about 768MB for it to get good performance out of the virtual environment, and of course 1GB is usually sufficient for good OS X operation, add that to the whole dual-core fact &#8211; and these results are not surprising at all.<\/p>\n<div style=\"color:red\">\n<strong>UPDATE (2006.11.12)<\/strong>\n\nI&#8217;ve posted a video showing [hopefully] <a href=\"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/11\/11\/videos-from-my-macbook-pro-sessions\" title=\"Read post\">a convincing run on the MBP<\/a> that should clear all doubts.\n<\/div>\n<p>Again, lot of factors may contribute to this satisfactory behavour. Perhaps it&#8217;s the 2GB RAM, 256VRAM, the Core 2 Duo architecture, larger cache, etc. My point however is this:<\/p>\n<p>While it may not be as fast <em>as one would hope<\/em> from a UB, the truth is this: If people in the G4 days we&#8217;re getting perfectly acceptable performance out of these applications, then these apps running on these new machines shouldn&#8217;t be a problem for them. With what I just did, the point <strong>has been proven<\/strong> that there <em>are<\/em> Intel-based macs which creative professionals can use normally, and not pull their hair over because of &#8220;performance penalties&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So sorry guys, if you think you could try justifying not upgrading because of &#8220;ridiculously slow&#8221; performance of Rosetta apps, that&#8217;s just not a good enough excuse anymore. If you claim that the earlier MBPs sucked ass when it came to rosetta-running Adobe or Microsoft apps, then maybe now you have a good reason to upgrade <em>yet again.<\/em><\/p>\n<h3>BRIGHTER<\/h3>\n<p>As already mentioned (and pictured) above, both display and keyboard backlights are much-much brighter.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, I&#8217;ve got the brightness on the 5th bar (that&#8217;s like 1\/4 of the way to the brightest setting possible), at 1\/4 brightness I&#8217;ve just matched about 80% of the PB&#8217;s max brightness (and mind you, I just had the LCD of that replaced with a new one). The keyboard backlight is extremely bright as well &#8211; as already mentioned, the lowest setting is brighter than the PB&#8217;s highest setting.<\/p>\n<p>The keyboard backlight continues to impress as they&#8217;ve improved the sensor and logic behind it. It clearly includes the ambient light coming from the LCD when it &#8220;adjusts&#8221; its brightness. The old PB&#8217;s always had a point wherein the LCD washed out the KB backlight, therefore negating its purpose &#8211; which was <em>very<\/em> frustrating. On the MBP however, when I dimmed the LCD, the KB backlight dimmed a little as well, if I pushed the LCD up, the KB backlight would glow more. Basically, what it does [now] is if you&#8217;re in a dark place, it engages the light &#8211; but then <em>makes sure<\/em> that it&#8217;s still brighter than the ambient light nearest to it (the LCD). That allows the KB backlight to be clearly visible at whatever setting you have.<\/p>\n<h3>HELLA COOLER<\/h3>\n<p>Up to now, I haven&#8217;t been using &#8220;special&#8221; software to control fan speed, et all. I can&#8217;t stress enough how cooler this thing is. On normal usage of my PB, I literally can&#8217;t hold on to the bottom for too long &#8211; it gets <em>that<\/em> hot. This MBP however, I&#8217;m holding in my palm as we speak. (and on other occasions as well).<\/p>\n<h3>SOUNDS&#8230; DIFFERENT<\/h3>\n<p>Being an audio fanatic, I immediately noticed how much more high-frequencies the MBP could spit out compared to the G4. I wouldn&#8217;t say it was a good or bad thing really. The G4 and the MBP sound ok, but ultimately, they&#8217;re laptops, and can only deliver so much fidelity. But personally, I don&#8217;t find the MBP sounding balanced, it&#8217;s like a typical cheap car speaker situation where people bump up the highs so much that it tends to sound too thin overall. The G4 <em>for me,<\/em> sounded more balanced &#8211; your mileage may vary though.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h1>WHAT I THINK<\/h1>\n<p>Before you continue reading, let me tell your right now that the review part has officially &#8220;ended&#8221; at this point. Everything below is just a commentary and personal insight. You need not waste your time reading it <em>unless<\/em> you are open to my opinions (which is worth jack shit).<\/p>\n<h3>IS UPGRADING WORTH IT?<\/h3>\n<p>The details\/factors that led to my decision of purchasing the laptop can be read in an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/10\/2006_10_25_0916.php\" title=\"Read post\">earlier post<\/a>. This information may be prove to be invaluable to those who are stuck with considerably older machines and are undecided whether or not <strong>now&#8217;s<\/strong> a good time to upgrade.<\/p>\n<p>Summarizing that post, it is safe to assume that Apple has always upgraded, and will continue to upgrade <em>all of their<\/em> products at a <strong>ridiculous<\/strong> pace &#8211; hence when talking in terms of Apple, it&#8217;s really pointless to &#8220;wait it out&#8221; in a sense because once you <em>do<\/em> get something, they&#8217;ll probably release something newer by the next month. Tough that shouldn&#8217;t mean that you should <strong>not<\/strong> wait at all (unless you have the money to burn).<\/p>\n<p>Simply try to get familiar with Apple&#8217;s upgrade cycles and purchase accordingly&#8230; and never look back. If you plan to buy something, and know there&#8217;s an impending &#8220;new&#8221; release, then wait a little and buy the newer one. But once you get it, don&#8217;t feel bad if you find out if they upgraded it <em>further<\/em> <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_4');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_4');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_4\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">4 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_4\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Which is a common emotion to have for those who bought non C2D MBPs.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_4').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_4', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> &#8211; get what I mean?<\/p>\n<p>Yet it is my belief (if you had read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/10\/2006_10_25_0916.php\" title=\"Read post\">previous post<\/a>) that everyone will probably agree that the number of new &#8220;features&#8221; in the MBP C2Ds are considerably impressive &#8211; it looked like it was worth upgrading even from the line <em>right before<\/em> them &#8211; moreso for those of us who are still on G4s<\/p>\n<h3>[WHAT WAS] AN EXCEPTION TO THE RULE<\/h3>\n<p>The only other legitimate reason to wait it out is the whole fact that some of the more <strong>intergral<\/strong> applications for the creative professionals (Adobe products, etc.) haven&#8217;t been ported to universal binaries yet. So expect them to perform poorly with the new Macs in general.<\/p>\n<p>But as you read above, right now, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an issue anymore.<\/p>\n<h3>WHICH OF THE THREE IS BEST [FOR ME]?<\/h3>\n<p>Normally, I wouldn&#8217;t really want to mention this part because it&#8217;s a very subjective topic. Personally, I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/10\/2004_10_14_1658.php\" title=\"Read post\">don&#8217;t bother looking at the 17&#8243;<\/a> anymore <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_5');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_5');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_5\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">5 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_5\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">They&#8217;re just too big &#8211; the context of which, makes me question the concept of &#8220;portable.&#8221;<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_5').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_5', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>, 12&#8243; probably would&#8217;ve been the best if they had shrunk the dot-pitch &#8211; allowing more resolution crammed into an already small screen. Alas that is not the case. <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_6');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_6');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_6\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">6 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_6\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Besides, there are no 12&#8243; MBPs as of now.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_6').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_6', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> 15&#8243; always seemed like a perfect median &#8211; you get <em>enough<\/em> real-estate, without having to carry a food-tray.<\/p>\n<p>From the choices, I&#8217;d say the lowest would be perfect. There are only <strong>3<\/strong> &#8220;considerable&#8221; differences between the 2.16 and 2.33: a 17MHz difference in processor speed, double the RAM, and double the VRAM. The first two however can be negated easily:<\/p>\n<p>You can always buy [cheaper] RAM modules to upgrade to 2GB later on &#8211; that right there saves those who aren&#8217;t hardcore from spending extra on resources <em>their usage<\/em> may not even require. As far as the CPU speed goes, you only &#8220;see\/feel&#8221; the 17MHz difference is when reading benchmarks or if you&#8217;re doing heavy duty rendering (as in hours of rendering may probably translate to minutes saved on a faster CPU) But as far as normal usage goes, I don&#8217;t think it justifies that big a price increase.<\/p>\n<p>The VRAM is the only thing that should concern buyers at this juncture, because you can&#8217;t BTO <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_7');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_7');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_7\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">7 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_7\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Built-to-order<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_7').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_7', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> a 2.16 to have 256VRAM. Having said that, I leave it to the readers to decide how much they really <em>need<\/em> that extra 128MB. I&#8217;m not saying whether or not you need it &#8211; what I&#8217;m saying though that if you&#8217;re comparing the two, use <em>that<\/em> as a gauge more than the CPU speed and RAM <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_8');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_535_1('footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_8');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_8\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">8 <\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_8\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Because as I said, the former is meaningless for most uses, and the latter can be done later one at a cheaper price.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_8').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_535_1_8', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script><\/p>\n<p>Having said that, the <strong>only<\/strong> reason I opted to get the 2.33GHz model was the deal I got for it &#8211; if I had purchased the 2.16, I&#8217;d only be saving about 2k (pesos) across all &#8220;competing&#8221; sellers; the 2.33 however got me a <em>considerable<\/em> amount of savings from a certain seller (plus the fact that I could get it this early as well)<\/p>\n<p>For the record though, all things being equal, I submit that the best bang for buck would be the cheapest, 2.16 model.<\/p><div class=\"speaker-mute footnotes_reference_container\"> <div class=\"footnote_container_prepare\"><p><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_label pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_535_1();\">Notes<\/span><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button\" style=\"display: none;\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_535_1();\">[<a id=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_535_1\">+<\/a>]<\/span><\/p><\/div> <div id=\"footnote_references_container_535_1\" style=\"\"><table class=\"footnotes_table footnote-reference-container\"><caption class=\"accessibility\">Notes<\/caption> <tbody> \r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_1');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_1\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>1<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Now this is actually something I don&#8217;t like, since now I can&#8217;t use my PCMCIA CF card adaptor with it.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_2');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_2\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>2<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Universal Binary &#8211; applications that were compiled to fully support the new architecture.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_3');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_3\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>3<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Apple&#8217;s &#8220;pseudo-virtualization&#8221; PPC to x86 translation engine (think of it as &#8220;Classic&#8221; for PPC apps) <\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_4');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_4\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>4<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Which is a common emotion to have for those who bought non C2D MBPs.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_5');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_5\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>5<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">They&#8217;re just too big &#8211; the context of which, makes me question the concept of &#8220;portable.&#8221;<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_6');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_6\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>6<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Besides, there are no 12&#8243; MBPs as of now.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_7');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_7\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>7<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Built-to-order<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index_combi pointer\"  onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_535_1_8');\"><a id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_535_1_8\" class=\"footnote_backlink\"><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8673;<\/span>8<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Because as I said, the former is meaningless for most uses, and the latter can be done later one at a cheaper price.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n <\/tbody> <\/table> <\/div><\/div><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function footnote_expand_reference_container_535_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_535_1').show(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_535_1').text('\u2212'); } function footnote_collapse_reference_container_535_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_535_1').hide(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_535_1').text('+'); } function footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_535_1() { if (jQuery('#footnote_references_container_535_1').is(':hidden')) { footnote_expand_reference_container_535_1(); } else { footnote_collapse_reference_container_535_1(); } } function footnote_moveToReference_535_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_535_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } } function footnote_moveToAnchor_535_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_535_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } }<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I got reprimanded by Juan last week during one of our conversations: juanporu: bibili na dapat ako ng c2d juanporu: kaso naubos pera ko dun sa &lt;site we rather not mention&gt; nargz: &#8220;c2d&#8221;? juanporu: core 2 duo juanporu: you gotta be in with the linggo dude&#8230; juanporu: you&#8217;re about to own one Now, I am &hellip; <p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/11\/07\/its-here\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;It&#8217;s here&#8230;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,12,13],"tags":[96,670,718],"class_list":["post-535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-photography","category-technology","tag-apple","tag-laptop","tag-macbook-pro"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=535"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1889,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535\/revisions\/1889"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}