{"id":453,"date":"2006-07-17T15:34:13","date_gmt":"2006-07-17T07:34:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/http:\/www.nargalzius.com\/blog2\/archives\/2006\/07\/2006_07_17_1534.php"},"modified":"2006-07-17T15:34:13","modified_gmt":"2006-07-17T07:34:13","slug":"is-beauty-really-subjective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/07\/17\/is-beauty-really-subjective","title":{"rendered":"Is beauty really subjective?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a rel=\"lightbox\" href=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/67\/191525537_0ccfcccfdf_o.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"You may click on the image for more details\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/67\/191525537_0ccfcccfdf_t.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I was reading an article which proposes the implementation of &#8220;subjective&#8221; <em>captchas<\/em> (pictured on the right) to determine if the user planning input data was a machine or not. It would show a series of pictures where the user would choose a person considered to be &#8220;hot&#8221; or &#8220;not.&#8221; While this can be pretty judgemental, it still works as the machines should have a more difficult time analyzing image data like that than simply analyzing strings of text.<\/p>\n<p>Among the people chanting that beauty was ultimately subjective, there was a comment which I found very interesting.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Saying that beauty is &#8220;subjective&#8221; is kind of a cop-out. It&#8217;s usually said by those of us who <em>wish<\/em> it was true. <strong>Just because one out of ten thousand people might find an ugly person remotely attractive doesn&#8217;t make that same person &#8220;attractive&#8221;<\/strong> anymore than a guy with a fat chick fetish makes an obese 800lb woman &#8220;skinny.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!--more-->\n<p>This is so true! So true that I don&#8217;t know if I should start worrying or not. This is much easier to apply to women than it is on men. Either way, I pray to God that at the very least, the [majority of] women would think I&#8217;m not ugly. Not being handsome is perfectly fine&#8230; just not <em>fuh-huuuuuugly<\/em> please!!!<\/p>\n<p>The first part of the comment was actually this:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Subjective? Hardly.<\/p>\n<p>It is scientifically known what makes an attractive person to 99.99% of society. Hell, you can take a classroom full of kindergarten children and they will almost unanimously and without disussing it, decide who an ugly teacher is and who a beautiful teacher is. They will then describe a beautiful teacher and ugly teacher with very different adjectives (one is mean, old, strict, dumb and the other is fun, nice, smart).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I think beauty can <em>become<\/em> a subjective element as one gains more experiences. But there probably is some kind of &#8220;default element&#8221; of beauty, a generic <em>physical<\/em> beauty in those who are truly &#8220;hot.&#8221; It&#8217;s the type of physical beauty that makes the above mentioned children decide who&#8217;s ugly or not right off the bat. And while we hate to admit it&#8230; to a certain extent, we roughly know if we ourselves are hot or not. The <em>real<\/em> question is what level of physical beauty, decency, or atrociousness we fall under.<\/p>\n<p>But even if that was true, the problem with the <em>captcha<\/em> is it can alienate a lot of users when implemented in a large scale. What about the &#8220;ugly&#8221; people you decide to use, you would be doing an incredibly insulting disservice to them.<\/p>\n<p>The concept behind it is brilliant no doubt, but why not just use &#8220;general&#8221; stuff you know a human can spot but a computer can&#8217;t. Say compare two images of a landscape &#8211; one computer generated, and a real one. And just ask people which is the CG (or real) one. I&#8217;m not into computer <code>AI<\/code> but I would think that the algorithms aren&#8217;t good enough [yet] to know the difference even if you use scenes that are obvious to the human eye.<\/p>\n<p>You can even take it further by simply asking if the scene <em>contained<\/em> special effects (wether CG or not). So take a normal still of someone falling off of a building from the 911 footage, then compare it to something like a still of Neo from <em>The Matrix<\/em> jumping off a building. I&#8217;d think any <code>AI<\/code> would be hard pressed to know which one was the real footage.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was reading an article which proposes the implementation of &#8220;subjective&#8221; captchas (pictured on the right) to determine if the user planning input data was a machine or not. It would show a series of pictures where the user would choose a person considered to be &#8220;hot&#8221; or &#8220;not.&#8221; While this can be pretty judgemental, &hellip; <p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/07\/17\/is-beauty-really-subjective\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Is beauty really subjective?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[5,13],"tags":[133,181,211,595],"class_list":["post-453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet","category-technology","tag-beauty","tag-bots","tag-captcha","tag-internet"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nargalzius.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}